[PD] poll: common problems when sharing performance patches

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Sat Feb 26 19:37:43 CET 2005

For the next phase of my [hid] toolkit project, I want to focus on  
addressing issues that make it difficult to share performance patches  
made with it.   RRADical is a very good example of what I am trying to  
accomplish with the HID side of things.So I thought I'd start with an  
informal poll of common problems people have when trying to use someone  
else's performance patch.  The most obvious one that I can think of  
right now would be getting the correct objects and libraries, and then  
there are the name conflicts.  These are things that are being  
addressed, albeit slowly.

I am particularly interested in patching styles, object functionality,  
etc. that makes sharing performance patches easier or harder.



            "The arc of history bends towards justice."
Martin Luther King, Jr.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 994 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20050226/95862877/attachment.bin>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list