[PD] two |vcf~| questions
fbar at footils.org
Tue Mar 8 12:29:22 CET 2005
julien.breval at tremplin-utc.net hat gesagt: // julien.breval at tremplin-utc.net wrote:
> 1. bypassing
> When you set Q to zero (rightmost inlet), this somehow bypasses the filter
> because the bandwidth is very wide; is it correct to do this ? Or should I
> rather make a traditional bypass circuit ?
I'd make a real bypass.
You can save some CPU cycles, if you bypass it completly using for
example a subpatch and [switch~]. Sending 0/1 to [switch~] inside a
subpatch will dis/enable this subpatch. You could also add a little
[$1 10(---[line~] ramp and delay the message to switch~ by 10msec to
Depending on your patch in granular synthesis the saved CPU cycles
can add up quite a bit and allow more grains.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: fqdn _ http://footils.org/cms/show/38
More information about the Pd-list