[PD] Segmented patch chords?

[Ian Smith-Heisters]

Jamie Bullock wrote:
> I think a list* data type is a really good idea. I've wanted a feature
> like this for some time, but don't like using externals in my patches
> unless I absolutely have to.

I think this is also an important issue. There should be a better way of 
packaging a patch with the required externals for better 
transferability. This would make it easier for us all to share. But for 
all I know you avoid externals for idealogical reasons rather than 
compatibility.

-ian


  I think this is definitely something that
> should be built into 'standard' PD, and not require an external.
> 
> Just my 2p!
> 
> Jamie
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
>>>However, GridFlow doesn't reconvert nested Ruby Arrays to this parenthese
>>>form: it just refuses them. Instead of implementing that feature in
>>>GridFlow, I thought Pd could be modified for that, and thus everyone could
>>>benefit from that feature without having to have +tot or GF.
>>
>>I mean this: that what both +tot and GridFlow do is incomplete and
>>potentially slow (because of a need to continually do post-parsing !)
>>and that a complete, non-hack solution is much desirable.
>>
>>_____________________________________________________________________
>>Mathieu Bouchard -=- Montréal QC Canada -=- http://artengine.ca/matju
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list


-- 
http://www.0x09.com