[PD] Segmented patch chords?
matju at sympatico.ca
Fri Mar 11 23:08:04 CET 2005
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote:
> -I don't th§ink that's the real reason why it was created.
> It was intended to be a platform independent foluw-up
> to the Max/FTS that ran on the Next machine with the
> was used for internal performances (so the IRCAM-people say...)
> and productions (so the IRCAM-people say...), strangely
> enough all their technical performance manuals
> all refer to Max/MSP.
So what you state as the real reason why it was created, is nothing but
the official statement of the IRCAM, regardless of actual facts?
> As far as the architecture of jMax itself, I quite like the idea
> of aclient/server in the way it was implemented.
This was the idea behind IMPD.
> But the notion of need a separate machine to run the gui, is ridiculous.
I've never "needed" that, and have successfully run several gallery
installations and one computer-assisted theatre performance without ever
using a remote GUI.
(Nevertheless, it's been a year that we have switched away from jMax for
all our shows)
Mathieu Bouchard -=- Montréal QC Canada -=- http://artengine.ca/matju
More information about the Pd-list