[PD] Segmented patch chords?

Mathieu Bouchard matju at sympatico.ca
Fri Mar 11 23:08:04 CET 2005

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote:

> -I don't th§ink that's the real reason why it was created.
>  It was intended to be a platform independent foluw-up
>  to the Max/FTS that ran on the Next machine with the
>  was used for internal performances (so the IRCAM-people say...)
>  and productions (so the IRCAM-people say...), strangely
>  enough all their technical performance manuals
>  all refer to Max/MSP.

So what you state as the real reason why it was created, is nothing but
the official statement of the IRCAM, regardless of actual facts?

>  As far as the architecture of jMax itself, I quite like the idea
>  of aclient/server in the way it was implemented.

This was the idea behind IMPD.

> But the notion of need a separate machine to run the gui, is ridiculous.

I've never "needed" that, and have successfully run several gallery
installations and one computer-assisted theatre performance without ever
using a remote GUI.

(Nevertheless, it's been a year that we have switched away from jMax for
all our shows)

Mathieu Bouchard -=- Montréal QC Canada -=- http://artengine.ca/matju

More information about the Pd-list mailing list