[PD] zexy 2.0 without [nop][correcting my lame-ass self]

[derek holzer]

Whoopsie! Didn't see the tilde there! I assume that [nop~] still exists. 
And I can see why [nop] wasn't the most popular object on the block. 
Cosmetic would be a good word for it ;-)

d.



derek holzer wrote:
> Hi Roman, IOhannes,
> 
>  > me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons.
> 
> More than "cosmetical", [nop~] is employed in the use of [limiter~] as a 
> way of delaying the signal one sample block. This makes the new Zexy 
> reverse-incompatible with its own help files for another object, as well 
> as any patches out there using [limiter~] as the help files would 
> suggest you to.
> 
> d.
> 
> 
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> 
>> hi
>>
>> me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons.
>> now i found out that it has been dropped from zexy.  is there a reason
>> to drop an object when it's already introduced? i mean, it's _not_ that
>> difficult to change the patches, so it's not a big deal, but i think
>> [nop] didn't "disturb" the library, or did it?
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 11:
"Always first steps"