[PD] zexy 2.0 with [nop]

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Roman Haefeli wrote:
> hi
> 
> me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons.
> now i found out that it has been dropped from zexy.  is there a reason
> to drop an object when it's already introduced? i mean, it's _not_ that
> difficult to change the patches, so it's not a big deal, but i think
> [nop] didn't "disturb" the library, or did it?
> 


hi.
sorry for not answering over the weekend, i have been out.

anyhow, [nop] is still there, but it became an abstraction (look in 
zexy/abs).
there is no reason to use any C-code for that functionality.

see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/pure-data/externals/zexy/abs/nop.pd


mfg.asd.r
IOhannes