[PD] buffer 1 with Gem

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Jun 7 09:42:52 CEST 2005

rainer _ wrote:
>>> btw, what do you people need the "buffer 1" feature for ?
>>> i thought of removing it a la long and "replace" it with some 
>>> controllable feedback in double-buffered >>mode.
>>> (this means: if single-buffered mode is used only to not make 
>>> "traces" of objects, this could be >>handled otherwise.)
>>> if someone needs full control over the render-chain, removing would 
>>> probably be a bad idea.
>> i would hardly wish not to remove it -

hardly or hard ?

> i use single bufferd mode a lot in my  pixel/video processing patches. 
> for me definitly a feature. please dont remove it !!!

again, the question is, what for did you need it exactly ? what feature 
of the single-buffer do you need ?


More information about the Pd-list mailing list