[PD] buffer 1 with Gem
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Jun 7 09:42:52 CEST 2005
rainer _ wrote:
>>> btw, what do you people need the "buffer 1" feature for ?
>>> i thought of removing it a la long and "replace" it with some
>>> controllable feedback in double-buffered >>mode.
>>> (this means: if single-buffered mode is used only to not make
>>> "traces" of objects, this could be >>handled otherwise.)
>>> if someone needs full control over the render-chain, removing would
>>> probably be a bad idea.
>
>
>> i would hardly wish not to remove it -
hardly or hard ?
>
>
> i use single bufferd mode a lot in my pixel/video processing patches.
> for me definitly a feature. please dont remove it !!!
again, the question is, what for did you need it exactly ? what feature
of the single-buffer do you need ?
mfg.a.sdr
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list