[PD] bang of loadbang
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Jun 27 14:38:40 CEST 2005
Frank Barknecht wrote:
> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> If I change the 12 to 20, then the stored float should be changed as
> well and maybe do some initialization through a loadbang inside. This
> is analogous to the real [float]. However the real one does not
> immediatly send a new value, if it is recreated using a different
> value. To keep this analogy the outlet of [rrad.float] should also not
> send a new value through its outlet after it gets recreated - provided
> it could do so.
the only question remaining (for me) is, why does this not work for
abstractions that are created via dynamic patching.
what is the difference between
[obj 100 100 rrad.float 12(
and creating an object [rrad.float 12] in the "bla" subpatch ??
More information about the Pd-list