[PD] denormals on intel celeron
TimBlechmann at gmx.net
Tue Aug 23 23:26:18 CEST 2005
> > Hmm, weren't PD_BADFLOAT and PD_BIGORSMALL defined already on your
> > system? It's "idfef __i386__" which I assumed would be turned on
> > for Celerons. What compiler are you using???
> gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 sorry - my c is a bit rusty (read: non-existant). i
> didn't know if it was being defined or not, so i added it to the
well, off course this will only work, if the externals you're using are
> > It's PD_BIGORSMALL that gets tested everywhere these days. But if
> > you found a way to make denormals despite all the PD_BIGORSMALL
> > fixes, I'd like to know where they're sneaking in.
> so would i...
this example is rather academic, but it shows, that denormals can't
completely be prevented (unless denormal bashing would be added
everywhere in the dsp tree)
mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de ICQ: 96771783
latest mp3: kMW.mp3
latest cd: Goh Lee Kwang & Tim Blechmann: Drone
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space
would say "I want to see the manager."
William S. Burroughs
More information about the Pd-list