[PD] announcing PureMeasurement
Matthias Blau
blau_m at web.de
Tue Sep 13 21:41:55 CEST 2005
Hi Frank,
thanks for the criticism. I once thought about using $0. However, as I
understand it, $0 creates a unique number in abstractions only, not in
subpatches. In fact, when I use your modified pm_scope and copy it, then
$0 gives the same number for both instances. Am I missing something here?
Opting for subpatces instead of abstractions is a personal preference: I
love it when everything is contained in just one file. Try to look at
things you did 5 years ago on a completely different system, and you
know what I mean.
--Matthias
Frank Barknecht schrieb:
> Hallo,
> Matthias Blau hat gesagt: // Matthias Blau wrote:
>
>
>>PureMeasurement is a collection of pd-patches (requiring iemlib) aimed
>>at providing students and researchers with tools to perform acoustical
>>measurements using audio interfaces.
>
>
> One word: WOW!
>
> (More words as minor criticism: I would prefer local variables in the
> tools-patches, though. They are not necessary for the "applications",
> as one would normally not use two instances, but for the tools this
> could be common. I attached a version of pm_scope.pd where I replaced
> the globals with "$0-" versions.)
>
> Ciao
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list