[PD] Behaviour of nested GoP abstractions

[Miller Puckette]

Hopefully, compiled on my webpage...

cheers
Miller

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:33:33PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hello Frank, Hello Miller
> thank you for the answers.
> 
> Where is the bugfix upload to be expected (be it today or later)? As a 
> new download or only in CVS (as I don't have the possibility to build pd 
> myself)?
> 
> Frank Barknecht schrieb:
> >Hallo,
> >Urs Liska hat gesagt: // Urs Liska wrote:
> >
> >
> >>1)
> >>What's the behaviour of GUI objects that are not visible because they
> >>are in subpatches? ...
> >You can also make a wrapper abstraction: let [gop-abs] be a GOP
> >abstracion. A wrapper would be [gop-abs-nogui] which has GOP switched
> >*off* and just has an instance of [gop-abs] with connected in/outlets
> >inside. 
> Thanks, I didn't think of _this_ way without code duplication :-(
> Obviously I should go for it when GoP isn't needed.
> 
> >
> >>2)
> >>Is it impossible to nest GoP abstractions?
> >
> >
> >Yes, but it is severly broken in pd-0.39 so basically it currently is
> >impossible to use 0.39 to build nested GOPs. 
> Well, seems to be bad luck that I just now tried this for the first time ;-)
> 
> Thank you again
> Urs
> 
> -- 
> Urs Liska
> Gl?merstr. 5
> D-79102 Freiburg
> 
> www.graft-music.com
> www.suono-mobile.de
> 
> [Pd 0.39.0, WinXP]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list