[PD] Dumb (?) [ctlin] question

[Frank Barknecht]

Hallo,
Urs Liska hat gesagt: // Urs Liska wrote:

> In the meantime, I thought to share my little workaround abstraction.
> The [pack] construct at the end of the line isn't necessary and could be 
> replaced by a second outlet. But I found it very practical for my 
> purposes - especially with the reversal of elements allowing to [route] 
> by CC number.

Attached is how I did it in the past, as an abstraction compatible to
yours, but maybe even simpler.

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
-------------- next part --------------
#N canvas 0 0 654 489 10;
#X obj 99 229 outlet;
#X obj 99 124 pack 0 0 0;
#X obj 99 85 ctlin;
#X obj 99 193 route \$1;
#X msg 99 152 \$3 \$2 \$1;
#X text 171 151 make list of: chan cc value;
#X text 172 194 let channel \$1 pass \, drop others;
#X connect 1 0 4 0;
#X connect 2 0 1 0;
#X connect 2 1 1 1;
#X connect 2 2 1 2;
#X connect 3 0 0 0;
#X connect 4 0 3 0;