[PD] performance-problem with [print] on pd-0.39 on win

Martin Peach martinrp at vax2.concordia.ca
Wed Sep 28 17:16:24 CEST 2005

Roman Haefeli wrote:

>i don't have an idea what the source of this immense cpu-load might be,
>using the flag '-stderr' is much better.
It's probably the overhead of the network connection between pd and 
pd-gui. Using a block of shared memory instead of sockets would give 
faster performance as long as it was small enough for the processor to 
keep it in its cache.


More information about the Pd-list mailing list