[PD] max msp vs pd
matju at artengine.ca
Tue Nov 1 12:13:58 CET 2005
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2005, at 4:24 PM, carmen wrote:
> > but a lot of things that are a limitation in one are a limitation in the
> > other, i mean why do you see so many cases of hacking in languages
> > extending/flexibilitating the core so that you dont think "damnit, i need
> > ruby for this..."
> I totally agree! Pd can be a programming platform, it does not need to be
> just an application. All great programming platforms are written in
> themselves: C, Java, Lisp, SmallTalk, etc. so why not Pd too? It needs some
> work to accomplish this, but it is within reach.
It takes a really long arm to have it within reach. (How many elbows?)
But I'm definitely not giving up.
And certainly it's a good start to make more abstractions. E.g. when I
wanted to rewrite Ruby in Ruby, I didn't have the skills nor the guts to
attack the meat of the problem, that is, the interpreter itself; but still
I started working on the project: I started with easy parts. I recoded a
lot of C code as Ruby code so that it becomes easier in the future to make
not only a Ruby-in-Ruby interpreter, but also a Ruby-in-whatever
Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list