[PD] Re: pure == slow, impure == fast ? was purepd
TimBlechmann at gmx.net
Sun Nov 20 11:56:34 CET 2005
> Of course we all know, that patched stuff id Pd is slower than coding
> stuff in C. Still we patch in Pd, why do we do it? Because performance
> is not all that matters, ease of programming, the ability to change an
> implementation on the fly etc. - all that is important as well and it
> is the major reason, scripting languages are taking over large parts
> of software development: The performance of the programmer is becoming
> the much more important bottleneck than the performance of the CPU.
right ... but that's why i think, reimplementing an external in pd is a
waste of time. if there _is_ working c code, that's fine to use and,
why shouldn't one just use it...
cheers ... tim
mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de ICQ: 96771783
latest mp3: kMW.mp3
latest cd: Goh Lee Kwang & Tim Blechmann: Drone
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space
would say "I want to see the manager."
William S. Burroughs
More information about the Pd-list