[PD] Re: pure == slow, impure == fast ? was purepd
fbar at footils.org
Sun Nov 20 12:23:21 CET 2005
Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
> Hey Frank,
> >Unfortunatly there is nothing that can replace [pool] and [OSC] in Pd
> >yet, and I don't want to ditch OSC support in RRADical and I cannot
> >ditch [pool], which is a constant pool of trouble for non-technically
> >inclined users. :(
> you are right, and i'm constantly trying to improve the docs and
> building process.
> Unfortunately the feedback concerning hints what to improve in which way
> is close to nothing.
> All i can do then is try to figure out the paths that non-technical
> users are taking which sometimes is hard to imagine, because they are
> too individual.
That's so true. For you and me and many others here, running "sh
build.sh pd gcc" is not a big deal at all, but well ...
However with the effort of Hans and James etc. to package Pd with
externals this really should become less of a problem soon.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
More information about the Pd-list