[PD] OSC in pd canonical (was Re: Re: pure == slow, impure == fast ? was purepd)

[Kyle Klipowicz]

I think this has something to do with liscensing compatibility.  Pd
isn't GNU (and OSC is?)   That is also why expr is an external rather
than an integrated object.  (Correct me if I'm wrong!)

~Kyle

On 11/20/05, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> Which begs the question; why isn't OSC functionality included in Pd
> canonical? After all, OSC is the new defacto standard in control
> messages isn't it? And Midi functionality is included already in Pd.

--
http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO