[PD] OSC in pd canonical (was Re: Re: pure == slow, impure == fast ? was purepd)
hans at eds.org
Tue Nov 22 03:57:27 CET 2005
On Nov 21, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:17:04AM -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
>> I think this has something to do with liscensing compatibility. Pd
>> isn't GNU (and OSC is?) That is also why expr is an external rather
>> than an integrated object. (Correct me if I'm wrong!)
> If that's the case I guess it could still be included in the same way
> that expr is.
I am pretty sure that OSC is released under BSD license. It does come
out of UC Berkeley after all...
More information about the Pd-list