[PD] OSC in pd canonical (was Re: Re: pure == slow, impure == fast ? was purepd)
fbar at footils.org
Tue Nov 22 13:32:52 CET 2005
günter geiger hat gesagt: // günter geiger wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > The license of OSC is fine (now), it could be shipped with Pd
> > immediatly.
> The license is fine, but the code is terrible. It would be better to have
> a fresh implementation or something based on liblo.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
More information about the Pd-list