[PD] nosferatu namespaces
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Nov 23 11:21:28 CET 2005
Georg Holzmann wrote:
>> note that the library does not have to implement an object of the same
>> name. e.g. there is no [Gem] object in Gem, but you still can load Gem
>> by creating an object [Gem]: the creation will fail but Gem will be
> yes, an other problem is, that e.g. [zexy] has to be created before
> [nop] ...
that's an important point.
[using] should be guaranteed to be called before any other object in the
and as you ahve pointed out in your previous mail, having a way to
specify the order of [using]s would be nice too.
> yes, two things about that:
> - this should be local to each abstraction (otherwise reausability of
> abstractions is not guaranteed - there could be nameclashes ...)
but hard to do...
> - there should also be a way to not load all externs of a lib (like in
> python "import nop from zexy" or in C++ "using zexy::nop" ...)
> (but I think we already discussed this ...)
that's why it's a zombie.
More information about the Pd-list