[PD] about [prepend] on osx
czaja at chopin.edu.pl
Sat Nov 26 20:59:15 CET 2005
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> believe that abbreviations in code cause a lot more trouble than they
> save. Something along these lines:
> "Instead of imagining that our main task is to instruct a computer what
> to do, let us concentrate rather on explaining to human beings what we
> want a computer to do."
> -Donald Knuth
which is why instructions for a computer should be kept short.
In Knuth's WEB there is @d, not @define, @i, not @include, etc.
Likewise, library prefix should not clutter the content. Its
main purpose is to instruct a computer where it is supposed to
look for an object's definition. For a reader of a patch
"cyclone/" means no more than "nonstandard/".
> I, for one, do not have an endless memory for abbreviations. I think I
> share that trait with the majority of population. Consider yourselves
> fortunate if you do have such a memory, but please humor the rest of us.
why the irony? I proposed cc as an option, after all. But ok,
I can live without it, although it is only one little, simple to
remember, hard-to-misspell abbreviation with a slight pun in it.
More information about the Pd-list