[PD] opening $0-subpatch bug?

[derek holzer]

derek holzer wrote:

> I checked it before I posted. But I also suggested [makefilename]. Can 
> we both be right? ;-)

OK, we can't both be right!! I just checked it AGAIN, and actually 
checked to see if it did what it was supposed to... i.e. open a subpatch 
or abstraction named $0-name. It didn't, for precisely the reason you 
gave. [prepend] doesn't truely merge the atoms, it just makes a list.

One beer for Screamin' F. Barknecht, coming right up!
d.

-- 
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 195:
"Describe the landscape in which this belongs."