[PD] using GEM in a collaborative environment

[Paris Treantafeles]

Hi Ben,

Thanks for the sample - I just took a look at it and it makes good  
sense to me - as you noted much like netsent/receive.

What is needed for an OSC server (multicast)?
I imagine that's what would be needed if you want internet  
collaboration of people in various locations?

Thanks,
p


On Dec 5, 2005, at 11:13 AM, B. Bogart wrote:

> OSC is a lot like the netsend/netreceive in UDP mode.
>
> Anyhow I attached a simple help patch to get you going.
>
> just be sure you look into the cool wild-card stuff. for example:
>
> /var/x 10
>
> will send the value "10" to the name /var/x.
>
> /var/[x|y|z] 10
>
> will send the to /var/x /var/y and /var/z
>
> b.
>
>
>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> I'm looking for a way to collaborate on the internet.
>> I haven't tried OSC but from your description below it sounds like
>> this may do it because I'd like participants to see their individual
>> work as well as the combined work of all users.
>>
>> Is there a simple patch or documentation that would help to get
>> started with learning to use OSC with PD?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> p
>>
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2005, at 12:18 PM, B. Bogart wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Paris,
>>>
>>> I experimented with this a little bit, but using multicast (or OSC
>>> server).
>>>
>>> Who is collaborating? (LAN, internet? VPN?)
>>>
>>> This example does not include local control
>>>
>>> say you have three cubes, each is connected to an OSCroute with say,
>>> something like /client1/pos X Y Z for the position.
>>>
>>> collaborator 1 sets his OSC name to "client1" and moves some  
>>> sliders.
>>> The data is all packed and redestributed to all clients each with a
>>> different client_name.
>>>
>>> then you just move the cubes on each client according to the  
>>> incoming
>>> OSC, each user can move thier cube, and all users can see the
>>> movements
>>> of all cubes...
>>>
>>> b.
>>>
>>>
>>> Paris Treantafeles wrote:
>>>> Hi List,
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if anyone knows of any projects which use GEM in a
>>>> collaborative way.
>>>> I've done some experiments with netsend and receive with more
>>>> than  one
>>>> computer controlling a patch but in that case, the user doesn't
>>>> see the
>>>> end result of what they are contributing too.
>>>> What I am interested in is a way for users to collaborate and  
>>>> see the
>>>> results as well.
>>>> Optimally, a user could see both what they contribute as well as a
>>>> final result.
>>>> I'd like to come up with a way to do this but thought it would be
>>>> interesting to see what's been done in this area first.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>> p
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
>>> listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>> <simpleOSC.pd>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list