[PD] Max user thinking about PD
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Fri Dec 9 04:48:05 CET 2005
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Christian Klippel wrote:
> Am Freitag 09 Dezember 2005 02:55 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard: [...snip...]
> > compare: [jit.op @op +] vs [# +]
>
> also, didnt the early incarnations of gridflow also use the @ sign?
Yeah, but with a different meaning.
GridFlow's @ was "at" as in "array", as in Perl, but it was used as a
prefix for grid-processing class names instead of as prefix of variables
of array type.
Jitter's @ is "at" as in "attribute", as in Ruby, but it's used as
keyword-arguments instead of as prefix of variables of instance scope.
Jitter's equivalent of GridFlow's "@" and "#" in classnames is the "jit."
prefix (but not exactly so)
Jitter's equivalent of GridFlow's "#" inside lists is... inexistent (?)
GridFlow's equivalent of Jitter's "@" is "," where applicable.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list