[PD] port used by sendOSC

[B. Bogart]

Hey,

Can [netclient] be used to replace sendOSC and dumpOSC and then use only
routeOSC for the routing?

I've not had a need for full duplex OSC yet...

b.

c wrote:
>>actually I just figured out that it wouldn't work, as the dumpOSC
>>object can't listen on the port that's being used by sendOSC.
>
>
> OSCx is half duplex. if you are unsatisfied with using seperate ports
> to send and recieve , you could look into enabling liblo in pd via
> Flext, or some of the OSC reflectors/managers like OSCgroups and a
> couple others whose name i can't recall..
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20051218/23fc9cb2/attachment.pgp>