[PD] Re: [PD-announce] sIgpAck0.03
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Sat Jan 7 16:47:53 CET 2006
On Jan 7, 2006, at 7:16 AM, m.weiss wrote:
> >Well, that's not my decision. So it seems, using a "." to seperate
> >prefixes from names doesn't work with older Pd's unless it's just an
> >alternate name (created with class_addcreator), right?
> >
> >So the other easy fix would be to use "sp_" instead of "sp."
> >
> >Ciao
> >--
> > Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
>
> salut
> thats right
> "sp." works only as library
> so why not compile it as library??
> gruss
> m.weiss
With the Pd-extended builds, there is a functional namespace. So the
sp. prefix is unnecessary. It also is kind of ugly and makes the
object names needlessly longer.
Mind if I remove the sp. prefix when I import it to CVS? I can leave
the library with the sp.* names so just the single objects will be
without.
.hc
________________________________________________________________________
____
News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is
publicity.
- Bill Moyers
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list