[PD] IntelMacs & PD/GEM
derek holzer
derek at x-i.net
Tue Jan 17 21:05:14 CET 2006
chris clepper wrote:
> On 1/17/06, derek holzer <derek at x-i.net> wrote:
>
>>Although I have
>>seen situations using a firewire camera where a GEM patch suddenly eats
>>2-300% of the CPU it used every other time you ran it, which I suspect
>>has something to do with the drivers used.
>
>
> Which firewire camera do you see that with? I have used many (iSight,
> iBot, ImagingSource, etc) and not had that problem. Can you reliably
> reproduce it? If so then post a patch to the list and I can look into
> it.
Sony TRV 900 and other camcorder types. Can't reliably reproduce, that's
what makes it so special...and frustrating. I've tried to track down the
source of this a few times, but without luck. Nothing has been changed
from the last time the patch was run, but the CPU use increases. Usually
a reboot is the only thing which fixes it. I'll take better notes next
time, so long as it isn't happening 10 minutes before a performance.
d.
--
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 164:
"Twist the spine"
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list