[PD] gemwin FSAA probs

[Max Neupert]

i experienced a huge visual difference with configuring the ati  
driver for os x manually.
see:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2005-11/032450.html

the FSAA manipulations inside pd didn't doo much compared to that.

Am 06.04.2006 um 22:09 schrieb timon botez:

> Thanks, but problems with macs is that drivers all comes bundled up  
> in the OS.
> Could you tell me what the max FSAA number is? And whats the main  
> difference in processing speed?
>
> Thanks,
> T.
>
>
>
>
> On 6 Apr 2006, at 20:25, chris clepper wrote:
>
>> We place no limitations of this kind when it comes to dealing with  
>> the GPU.  Anything like this is very probably going to be a driver  
>> issue.
>>
>> On 4/6/06, timon <timon at sosolimited.com> wrote: Hi,
>> I have found some issues with screen sizes when sending FSAA number
>> to gemwin. When I send any FSAA number (anything from 2-24) on a G5
>> running two screens i am not able to generate a window higher 1200 x
>> 1000 . Sending 0 lets me make as big of a window as 3800x1200. But
>> thats without any anti aliasing, and since Im working with text
>> objects it looks a bit pre-dated. Is there anywhere I can find some
>> information about optimising the FSAA while having big gem windows?
>>
>> Its odd that the antialiasing affects the screen size. In older Gem
>> versions this has not been an issue (sorry, dont mean to complain).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Timon.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
>> listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list