[Pd] Tuning a Mac

[Kyle Klipowicz]

Easiest would be to see if you have any 48000 hard-wired calculations.
 You should be using [samplerate~] instead, if you wish to change that
feature and still use the patch.  Maybe just search yoru patches for
that number?

I don't know what externals you are using or if the issue is with them...

~Kyle

On 4/13/06, Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
> > On 4/13/06, Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:
> > > 48000/44100 is 1.467 semitones and that isn't "almost a whole step" in any
> > > way, if you're as seriously into microtonality as you put it.
> > > dwarf 12-tET some more and then try again.
> > What could be causing Pd to play out of tune by more than a half-step?
> > I hope I didn't offend you by saying the harmonic possibilities of
> > some other tuning systems dwarf those of 12-tET.  That's not an
> > opinion.
>
> I meant that first you should measure the thing and make sure that it's
> really exactly 1.467 semitone of difference. If it is, then it is the
> 48000/44100 problem, and if not, then I don't have a clue, but an accurate
> figure will give hints.
>
>  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
> | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>


--
http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO