[PD] PDDP meeting?

Chris McCormick chris at mccormick.cx
Tue May 2 03:37:52 CEST 2006


On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:36:51AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2006, Chris McCormick wrote:
> 
> > > Third is a rule for OOP in general, in any language: the final goal is
> > > never to make a program "more OOP", it's to make a program better, by 
> > > any "paradigm" necessary.
> > Fourth, watch out for communists, who are all out to get you.
> 
> I'd rather have you reply with interesting ideas, but I can deal with
> flames too. It's sort of disappointing, though.

Yep, I feel kind of embarrassed about the tone of my reply. I guess I
hadn't had my coffee yet. It is pretty frustrating though, after we had
such a civil email exchange about the advantages of considering puredata
as a programming language and trying to fit Pd into various paradigms, to
have you completely misrepresent and mock the other side of the argument
in such a ridiculous fashion. Let's agree on more mature discussion from
now on.

Best,

Chris.

-------------------
chris at mccormick.cx
http://mccormick.cx




More information about the Pd-list mailing list