[PD] a little ot: creative commons
Frank Barknecht
fbar at footils.org
Thu Jun 15 15:40:01 CEST 2006
Hallo,
João Miguel Pais hat gesagt: // João Miguel Pais wrote:
> which license would be advised for free software, and in concrete for pd
> patches? I was thinking about something free to all uses, but where
> reference to the original creator would be kept. in the CC site they
> advise to choose other licenses to software than their's.
Generally Pd's license is well accepted in the comunity, another
popular choice is the GPL. I would recommend to stay away from trying
to make up your own license.
There seems to be no consensus about wether a patch, that uses
externals released under GPL, should have to be GPL, too. Personally I
don't believe it has to be GPL, but I think, IOhannes once argued that
it has to be GPL as well. (Which would mean, that all patches using
[expr] would need to be GPL, btw.)
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list