[PD] how to trigger bang's with a period less than 1 milisecond
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Sun Jun 18 20:57:10 CEST 2006
On Jun 17, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> On Jun 17, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>> And of course another solution would be a clone of [metro] built
>>> using
>>> [del] as in attached patches.
>>
>> How about making that a [metro] clone and adding it to abstractions/
>> purepd?
>
> Actually I think, [metro] should loose its 1 ms limit, then the
> abstraction wouldn't be necessary (and it can block Pd quite easily
> with very small delay times). IIRC Miller already hinted at the
> possibility for making metro's limit smaller.
[metro] should be fixed, but I also think that since you already
implemented a [metro] in Pd, it should be part of the purepd
collection as part of the effort to implement as much of Pd in Pd as
possible.
>> Also, I think it would be clearer to use [delay] rather than [del],
>> there's plenty of room in the patch, no abbreviations necessary. I
>> guess my DOS roots show, because I always think delete first when I
>> see [del].
>
> If it's in an abstraction, you won't see the [del] anyways. Smaller is
> beautifuller. ;)
>
> But maybe I'm too used to use the abbreviations for often used
> objects. Reading [trigger anything anything] makes me as nervous as
> reading [del] must make you. ;)
The length difference between [del] and [delay] is quite trivial, but
the difference in readability is large. Sure, we are used to the
abbreviations, but maintainable code is as clean and easy to read as
possible.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list