[PD] a little ot: creative commons

[Tim Blechmann]

On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 09:24 -0400, Marc Lavallée wrote:
> > > work. A picture retouched with the Gimp is a derivative work of
> the
> > > original picture, not of the Gimp.
> >
> > It's not a suitable analogy because the picture doesn't contain a
> copy of
> > the Gimp.
> 
> Just like a patch using [expr] does not contains a copy of [expr].

loading expr could be interpreted as binding to facilities:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCIfInterpreterIsGPL

t

--
tim at klingt.org    ICQ: 96771783
http://www.mokabar.tk

I must say I find television very educational. The minute somebody
turns it on, I go to the library and read a good book.
  Groucho Marx
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20060621/bf73e8e2/attachment.pgp>