[Pd] splitting Pd on two processors
Urs Liska
pd at ursliska.de
Fri Jun 30 12:06:36 CEST 2006
Thanks IOhannes,
that's what I wanted to hear during a few recent threads concerning dual
core processors ;-)
Urs
IOhannes m zmoelnig schrieb:
> Urs Liska wrote:
>> For example:
>> One computer running a complete pd instance with the gui and physical
>> controllers, the other running a (-nogui) pd doing the "work",
>> and both instances communicating via OSC.
>>
>> Would that work (well)?
>> (well, this scenario would also make sense on Dual Core processors,
>> isn't it?)
>
> definitely.
>
> we use such approaches for most of our CPU-hungry applications (like the
> CUBEmixer), although we don't use OSC but netsend/netreceive: less
> processing overhead involved at the cost of non-compatibility with other
> appications
>
> we even use this on single-processor machines: the "number crunching" pd
> -nogui runs with "-rt" and a quite low latency whereas the gui runs with
> a lower priority.
> whether the physical controllors are attached to the gui or to the dsp
> is a matter of design.
>
> mfg.asdr.
> IOhannes
>
--
Urs Liska
Glümerstr. 5
D-79102 Freiburg
www.graft-music.com
www.suonomobile.de
[Pd 0.39.2, WinXP]
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list