[PD] sending large arrays / soundfiles

Kevin McCoy km.takewithyou at gmail.com
Thu Jul 13 05:26:10 CEST 2006


Thanks - yes I should be using netjack for this, but I'm dirty and lazy so
far on it.  I have gotten OSC to successfully transfer small arrays just
now.  I'm just now about to try it with large arrays of sound data...

Thanks for the suggestions!
Kevin

On 7/12/06, carmen <_ at whats-your.name> wrote:
>
> On Wed Jul 12, 2006 at 08:53:02PM -0500, Kevin McCoy wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm working on doing some granular stuff and whirling the sound around
> the
> > room via multiple machines (2 outs each).  I want to record sound to an
> > array and then get a copy of that array on each machine (there are 4
> > currently) via a LAN.  From what I've read, OSC might not be the most
> > efficient way to do this.
>
> in order of what i'd try:
>
> OSC burst/nonrealtime transfer of audio buffers in binary blobs: do any
> apps do this? is it going to choke liblo and/or pd's implementation? i think
> youd just have to try it, or check osc-dev. without the ability to stream or
> dump the raw 'bytes' of the buffer inside PD's patcher interface, you'll
> have to modify one of the OSC objects to read the table data directly unless
> you want to do something really slow like serialize to a bunch of floats
>
> netjack (via jackd). latency is predictable (you choose)
>
> streamin~/streamout~ (native) not sure if it reports latency at all
>
> write tables to disk -> NFS/samba
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20060712/9696dff4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list