[PD] some macro ideas
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Wed Oct 4 01:51:57 CEST 2006
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, padawan12 wrote:
> Which is why the idea of an "alias" isn't quite the same thing as an
> "embeded abstraction". I guess a better way of explaining what I mean is
> that an alias is a subpatch with local scope, so you can define $0- type
> things inside it like tables and then copy it with impunity, but if you
> edit the "master" copy the others all follow suit.
Really? Then what do you mean by "embedded abstraction" now?
> I think the missing ingredient in all this are "local variables"
> for subpatches.
This is complicated by the fact that many subpatches use $-variables to
access what belongs to their parent.
>> [myEmbeddedAbstraction args] inside just this patch. But I guess that
>> this is as tricky to implement as the [import] object that was
>> discussed recently on pd-dev. But maybe it isn't.
Ah, in the last mail I forgot to think about the evaluation order of
object constructors in a patch. That's going to be a big problem, or at
least an "ugly" one; sort of like the kind of reason that pushed the
authors of C to require declarations to be above the uses of functions (so
that the compiler doesn't have to parse things twice...)
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list