[PD] Version 0.40-0test05 on XP

[Steffen Leve Poulsen]

hi,
Pd version 0.40-0test05  on XP
no externals just a lot of abstrations.
I have some crash, if you need help debugging.
What are you looking for?

nb  It's not difficult to fry XP with cpu intensive stuff.
mvh/  Steffen

At 01:29 15-10-2006, you wrote:

>Well, I managed to crash 0.40-0 once on XP, although I can't replicate
>the problem... my plan is to make a patch that automatically opens and
>closes patches adn other files repeatedly to see if that can engender
>crashes.  It's been pretty tough to debug things like that on XP (the last
>such problem went away when I used the debugger).   However, 0.39 ended
>up getting updated twice before it was exactly right (0.39-2) and perhaps
>the same will end up happening with 0.40...
>
>cheers
>Miller
>
>
>On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:58:22PM -0500, David Powers wrote:
> > First, let me say that I have got some things running really stable -
> > ie. generative MIDI output, and Gem, once I upgraded to the
> > experimental version, and modified some things in my patches, to get
> > around limitations of that version.
> >
> > However, my biggest problem with PD is still that things crash all the
> > time, but nobody ever can say why, and I'm not sure if things are
> > improving. Particularly, when working with digital audio, there seem
> > to be some problems, as well as in the opening and closing, and
> > modifying of files, generally. I'm not sure if this is a WinXP issue,
> > or what - but I'm having such problems even with "core" PD, no
> > externals added, just modifying Miller's example patches. The
> > frustrating thing is, others don't seem to be able to replicate it,
> > and sometimes even I can't replicate the error.
> >
> > But still - unstable is unstable, and for a live performance or
> > installation, that's a BIG problem. What am I to do if PD crashes in
> > the middle of a 45 minutes piece with live musicians???
> >
> > The end result is that I may be forced to use commercial software like
> > Reaktor, when it would be nice to use something open source, and where
> > I would be ready to share the results of my patches with the PD
> > community.
> >
> > ~David
> >
> > On 10/14/06, Adrian <nordbaer at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >I'm sorry for this more like OT, it's just my thought about improving
> > >PD and it's externals in another way.
> > >
> > >I'm struggling ...
> > >
> > >PD is one of the best tools for making people
> > >learn/experiment/perform/interact digital/electronic art at it's best.
> > >But where are the people that are PD's target. I'm trying to suggest
> > >that PD should try to follow a Popper-alike way of developing. Make it
> > >easy accessable for the people and use their input. Except if PD and
> > >it's externals are purely egoistic developments, which i don't think
> > >is the case ;)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>_______________________________________________
>PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/475 - Release Date: 13-10-2006
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/475 - Release Date: 13-10-2006