[PD] and it's PR/Marketing, or those

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

I like that idea, a gallery section on the front page and a really  
easy way to post to it would be a good way.  Like the processing.org  
stuff on the left side of the page.

.hc

On Oct 17, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:

> Another cool thing that we should add is a section for completed  
> works:  mp3's/ogg's, mov's/avi's, etc.  I really am inspired when I  
> watch things like the Henry Bros doing insane physical modeling a/v  
> stuff in real time on a video.  This is also nice because you don't  
> have to share your "secrets," but can still let people see what is  
> possible with Pd.
>
> Every senior list member should be responsible for showing at least  
> one super bad-assed creation on the website to boost newbie morale.
>
> ~Kyle
>
> On 10/17/06, Pete Hindle <petehindle at gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> Hello;
>
> Here are some of the topics that I think it would be useful to have
> available on the website:
>
> * What it is, in simple terminology
> * What people are doing with it
> * How to install it - where to find different versions, and a sub-
> page with 'common problems' that people have when installing
> * Some simple tutorials with patches (the first howto on the current
> page is Miller's book!)
>
> How does this list strike other people?  I've tried to keep sort-of
> within the boundaries of the current website structure.
>
> Pete
>
>
> On 17 Oct 2006, at 09:47, Steffen wrote:
>
> >
> > On 16/10/2006, at 22.01, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> >
> >> Hallo,
> >> Steffen hat gesagt: // Steffen wrote:
> >>
> >>> I also know, that things only get done when people voluntarily
> >>> actually do it (as in any anarchistic environment). Therefor,  
> though
> >>> i can't promise it, i will see to make a prober proposal for  
> such a
> >>> change. Much will stay the same, as the present documentation  
> of the
> >>> Pd scene isn't done by fools, most sertanly the complete opposite,
> >>> but i think i have quite unspoiled eyes, to see where changes  
> could
> >>> be to the better, as i have done very little work in Pd and  
> therefor
> >>> don't know very much.
> >>>
> >>> Now; would it be welcome?
> >>
> >> I think, this is a great idea, and an outside view (spoiled or  
> not ;)
> >> is good to have.
> >>
> >> Everyone who wants to get more involved how the website should look
> >> like and be structured should probably subscribe to the pdweb list:
> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb
> >
> > okay dokay - i'll post to he pdweb list when done.
> >
> > Best, steffen
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
> > listinfo/pd-list
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> http://theradioproject.com
> http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
>
> (((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
> (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
> ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
> _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
> ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------

"[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are  
deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from  
scarcity."        -John Gilmore


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20061020/4e136fea/attachment.htm>