[PD] "declare" object : "wrong" -path retrieval for embedded abstractions ?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Thu Nov 9 20:01:58 CET 2006
On Nov 5, 2006, at 2:35 PM, pierre cage wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I was stupidly thinking of a standard (but redundant) dir hierarchy to
> store dependent abstractions : NAME.pd should contain ( declare -path
> NAME_abs ) and /NAME_abs/ should host embedded abstractions,
> themselves containing ( declare -path ... , etc.
>
> Unfortunately, this can't be done as umbedded "declare" objects miss
> relative dirs to point unanimously to the main dir (i.e to the path of
> the "patch").
Hmm, that sounds like a bug, if I understand it correctly. Could you
send examples?
> Comparatively, HCS's "getdir" object does a good job retreiving each
> relative path.
Just to set the record straight, the illustrious Günter Geiger wrote
[getdir], not me. I am just an avid user and proponent of it.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All information should be free. - the hacker ethic
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list