[PD] convolution weirdness
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Nov 21 10:22:27 CET 2006
Charles Henry wrote:
> The "weirdness" to which I was referring here was because rfft~
> didin't have a nyquist component of the signal. So, the error was
> around .001 for regular tones and varied according to slight phase
> shifts, between 0 and 1 at the Nyquist frequency. So, I switched to
> fft~ and ifft~ and the error dropped to 10^-8 (which is aprox. 1/24
> bits of precision).
> I am using Pd-extended-38.4. Don't know if this has already been
> reported or fixed. I'm lagging behind current releases :)
afaik, this has been reported and fixed.
mfg.asdr
IOhannes
> Chuck
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list