[PD] up-down saw-wave

[threen]

> Sorry for being clumsy.

why? you aren't. 

> I write off-list since im not sure this is of anyones interest as  
> such, 

why? its a bad idea. now im the bad guy... 

i havnt misread anything. just using this "opportunity" to make a little
attemp to fish some sound aesthetic related issues up, especially in
digital domain. no bite...

> I try to be nice, but  
> clumsy can stop that alright.

didnt expect you'll be so humble...
sorry then...
  


On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:38:47 +0100, "Steffen" <stffn at dibidut.dk> said:
> 
> On 23/11/2006, at 18.29, threen wrote:
> 
 > then what would we be refering to if he didnt. would that be  
> > understood as well and would that change the use of filter technics  
> > in conventional/commercial way
> 
> You lost me.
> 
> I just want to correct something. When i said "might be understood by  
> all" i was just trying to say that what i pointed out, might be a  
> known, trivial thing, and that the comment on the filters was not  
> triggered by a miss read of analord to analog.
> 
> I can just feel, this don't come out right. Basically i was just  
> trying to make a catch all, such that i didn't necessarily   
> insinuated that you infact did miss read, as it could well be that  
> you didn't.
> 
> Sorry for being clumsy.
> 
> I write off-list since im not sure this is of anyones interest as  
> such, i just wanted you to know what i meant. I try to be nice, but  
> clumsy can stop that alright.
> 
> Best, steffen

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be