[PD] pix_record mixed pixes

[chris clepper]

On 12/7/06, Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
> what's a lot more surprising is that
>
> [pix_video]
>   |
> [pix_gain]
>   |
> [t a a]
>   |   |
>   |  [pix_invert]
>   |
> [pix_record]
>
> actually applies [pix_invert], because gem messages handle pix (and all
> the other state) by pointer, so that the pix seemingly sent from
> [pix_gain] to [pix_record] is actually modified although the message sent
> isn't modified.
>
> This doesn't necessarily happen in other video plugins.


Reversing the order of pix_invert and pix_record won't apply the inversion
though.  That would be consistent with the rest of Pd messaging right?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20061207/56cf8b71/attachment.htm>