polypoly [was: Re: [PD] overcome nqpoly4 limitations]

Cesare Marilungo cesare at poeticstudios.com
Sun Dec 10 18:09:03 CET 2006


Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Cesare Marilungo hat gesagt: // Cesare Marilungo wrote:
>
>   
>>> I think, a successor of nqpoly4 should not care about voice allocation
>>> at all by itself.
>>>  
>>>       
>> In fact I was trying to the same thing using nqpoly4 voice allocation, 
>> but I wasn't thinking that there's no gain in using it for this kind of 
>> purpose. In fact the abstraction are all instantiated when the nqpoly4 
>> object is created and the bang to the abstraction outlet only tells 
>> nqpoly4 which voice has been freed.
>>     
>
> Maybe you like the little variation of nqpoly4 that I made and
> attached. I called it [polypoly] and it's a kind of mix between
> [nqpoly4] and [poly] intended to simplify traditional "midi"-like
> polyphony in Pd. 
>
> You use it almost like [poly], but additionally you pass the name of
> an abstraction. From then on it does everything for you: it creates
> the abstractions, connect in- and outlets, where the outlets are
> signal outlets now. 
>
> The abstraction to "polyphonize" just needs one inlet for (note
> velocity)-pairs, one inlet for loadbang, and two signal outlet~s for
> left and right audio channel. 
>
> Ciao
>   

Thanks, I'll try it.

c.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>   


-- 
http://www.cesaremarilungo.com





More information about the Pd-list mailing list