polypoly [was: Re: [PD] overcome nqpoly4 limitations]

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Mon Dec 11 04:10:36 CET 2006


On Dec 10, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:

> Hallo,
> Cesare Marilungo hat gesagt: // Cesare Marilungo wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I'll try it.
>
> Cool. I've made some further changes which make polypoly a bit more
> useful. I removed the need to have an inlet as a loadbang replacement
> in the polypoly-abstractions that are automatically created.
> Loadbangs can now be used just like in any other abstraction.
>
> Then I reused the existing right inlet of the polypoly-abstractions as
> an inlet to customize it. The inlet is connected to polypoly's middle
> inlet now.  (I guess I will remove the third inlet ot [polypoly] as
> it's not useful with [poly] because you cannot change the polyphony of
> [poly] with a message anyway).
>
> I think, this now is a really useful approach to make traditional and
> even some not so traditional approaches to polyphony easy in Pd. (Yes,
> Hans, it will go to CVS soon. ;)

Oh wait, aren't I suppose to nag here?  Hmm, now I don't know what to  
say! ;)

I vote for a more descriptive name, like [poly_allocate] or  
[poly_voices] or something...

.hc


>
> Ciao
> -- 
>  Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
> <polypoly.tgz>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no way to peace, peace is the way.       -A.J. Muste






More information about the Pd-list mailing list