[PD] int float with pure data

padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Mon Dec 11 21:35:11 CET 2006


>as for now I think I can count up to 16 777 216.
>correct? ok, I can live with that for the moment.
>m.
>
>marius schebella wrote:
>> that's the problem with floats...
>> another question I have is, how high is it possible to count without 
>> problems?

Indexing tables with very big sizes is one place I've seen
the precision limitations come up in Pd. If you index a huge
sound file with a slow moving phasor you will hear tiny jumps
as it gets further and further into the array.



>> marius.
>> 
>> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>>> Hallo,
>>>> thomas thiery hat gesagt: // thomas thiery wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hello, I have just seen me a bug under pure data but I do not manage 
>>>>> to explain it. The problem comes from the int's box, I believe. I 
>>>>> think that you know it already. Here my patch
>>>> Hm, I don't really see what should be the bug in this patch?
>>>>
>>>
>>> roll to 41
>>>
>>> mfg.asdr
>>> IOhannes
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>
>> 
>> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




More information about the Pd-list mailing list