[PD] helpfiles
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Sat Jan 6 15:00:31 CET 2007
On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:32 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> The PDDP standard for this is to have every object have its own
>> help file, then have a shared "all_about" patch for the common parts.
>
> But how much is the PDDP "standard" grounded in actual practice, as
> opposed to plans of future practice? Then what's the incentive to
> take it for granted?
>
> So, tell me, what's doc/pddp/operators-help.pd and doc/pddp/
> otherbinops-help.pd and how do they follow the PDDP standard. Then
> explain to me what's making the PDDP standard a standard.
>
>> Each object's help patch should have an example that is specific
>> to that object. If there aren't different examples, then I don't
>> see the point of having different objects...
>
> But what if I come up with the same example, involving the N
> different objects, in N different help patches. Do I have to copy
> +paste it all over the place?
>
> But how about answering the question that was in the mail that you
> replied to? That is:
>
>>> How do I specify the name of the helpfile I want to have opened?
>>> I want to do like class_sethelpsymbol() but for abstractions
>>> instead of externals.
Personally, I think that class_sethelpsymbol() should be deprecated
and removed, so I wouldn't advocate for the same thing for Pd
objects. I think it encourages kludges.
.hc
>
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
> | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either
change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list