[PD] (no subject)

[Matteo.sistisette]

> anyway, why do you want to have a litteral \'$0\' in the abstraction
> argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the
> same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when you
> plan to save the patch with all the dynamically generated stuff

OR when the patch that will receive the message is not the same one (or a
subpatch of the one) in which you generate the message; that is, if \"$0\"
evaluates to different values in the two contexts.
This is possible, isn\'t it? This wouldn\'t necessarily involve saving....


However, I think an escaping mecanism (at least for $\'s in messages) would
indeed be vital.
WHENEVER a special character exists, an escape character should exist, just
in case.

Bye
M. 
 --
 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Problemi di Liquidità? Con Logos Finanziaria 30.000 € in 24 ore a
dipendenti e lavoratori autonomi con rimborsi fino a 120 mesi clicca qui

 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2907&d=20070208

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070208/cfdebf1b/attachment.htm>