[PD] Re: pix_film more questions (Roman Haefeli)

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Sun Feb 18 22:58:31 CET 2007


i don't know to which mail you are answering, but i still believe, that
pd's [metro] is absolute accurate (even sub-sample-accurate), when used
in combination with [vline~] for example. 
the only case, where it could be considered inaccurate, is when cpu-load
is too high, though when writing to a file, it is still accurate.


On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 11:21 +1100, schiemer at uow.edu.au wrote:
> If you're worried by metro's irregularity then you should use Eric Lyons' samm~ (sample accurate multiple metronomes). This is described in 
> http://www.sarc.qub.ac.uk/~elyon/LyonPapers/SampleAccurate-Lyon-ICMC2006.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de

More information about the Pd-list mailing list