[PD] Percolate

Kevin McCoy km.takewithyou at gmail.com
Tue Mar 6 23:51:21 CET 2007

This is encouraging, as munger~ is really the object I want to use the
most.  My opinion is keep going even if we don't figure out the
licensing right away.  I'm just starting to realize what a conundrum
licensing could be.

Has anyone considered contacting the original authors and requesting
GPL licensing?  Is there any other kind of permission we could seek?

Also, what about derivative code?  I have little knowledge about the
differences in these licenses, so if someone could point out a
particularly lucid article that would be tight.


On 3/6/07, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico.bukvic at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Given the recent discussion, here's some ahead notice (FWIW). I am currently
> working with my GTA on completing the port of the munger~ object which is a
> part of the Percolate lib but is also broken in the old Pd port. The port is
> flext-based which will allow the original author to continue its maintenance
> in a platform-agnostic way. The current status is that it is fully
> operational and based off of the 0.9beta5. The only thing remaining is to
> port elements found in the beta6 and release it. We should be hopefully
> releasing this object in the next couple of days.
> Best wishes,
> Ico
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



More information about the Pd-list mailing list