[PD] Percolate

Kevin McCoy km.takewithyou at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 05:31:14 CET 2007

Any progress on this so far or a response from the authors about
modifying licensing?  Just checking - I have enjoyed reading about
copyrights but I was just wondering the status of this.  Maybe it's
too soon to ask though.


On 3/6/07, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico.bukvic at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Oh, please try! Having percolate's non-STK objects available would be
> > so lovely. I'm sure it's not in their intention to keep percolate from
> > being used in open source projects just because of a hairy license
> > issue, but they are the only ones who could do something about it.
> BTW, the latest version of munger~ 0.9beta6 is STK-dependent. The one we
> have currently built and is working just fine isn't (this one is based off
> of 0.9beta5). FWIW, you can always compile flext with stk... Alternately, a
> couple ifdefs should do the trick...
> Best wishes,
> Ico
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



More information about the Pd-list mailing list